How can an investigator ensure they respect a citizen's right to privacy during surveillance?

Conducting justified surveillance is key to respecting a citizen's right to privacy. Justified surveillance refers to ensuring that there is a lawful reason to monitor an individual, which typically means demonstrating that there is a legitimate investigative need based on specific facts or evidence. Investigators must balance their need for information with individuals' rights, adhering to legal standards and ethical guidelines.

This approach considers the necessity of the surveillance activity, ensuring it is not overly intrusive given the circumstances. When surveillance is justified, it aligns with the principles of legality and proportionality, making it more acceptable within the framework of privacy rights. This not only protects the individual being surveilled but also helps maintain the integrity of the investigation and the investigator's credibility.

In contrast, avoiding any form of surveillance could hinder legitimate investigations, while using covert methods indiscriminately or avoiding interactions with the suspect may lead to overly secretive or inefficient practices, which could further complicate the investigative process.